Does anyone have a comparsion chart of the features and benefits between Quickr versus Sharepoint. I am visiting a new customer next week. I could not locate anything like that.
Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets - Part I - Anatomy of a Widget Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets - Part II - Let's Assemble Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets - Part IIIA - Using Dojo To Bring It Together This is two part of my five part series "Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets". As I mentioned in part one of this series, Twitter Bootstrap widgets are built from a collection standard HTML elements, styled, and programmed to function as a single unit. The goal of this series is to teach you how to create a Bootstrap widget that utilizes the Bootstrap CSS and Dojo. The use of Dojo with Bootstrap is very limited with the exception of Kevin Armstrong who did an incredible job with his Dojo Bootstrap, http://dojobootstrap.com. Our example is a combo box that we are building to replace the standard Bootstrap combo box. In part one, we built a widget that looks like a combo box but did not have a drop down menu associated with it to allow the user to make a select...
Comments
http://www.duffbert.com/duffbert/blog.nsf/d6plinks/TADF-7LY5CC
You saw Ed's recent post from this week I am sure as well.
If Integration is important, we integrate better to SP.
What the customer wants to do is important as well as Quickr can bring a company into Web 2.0 better than SP but again context is the issue.
I try to provide an ROI of 90 days or less for Quickr projects. Sharepoint can involve hardware and infrastructure costs depending on how they want to roll it out.
Replication for remote locations might be a good selling point as well as Quickr with DAOS can reduce network traffic and disk space usage.
Thanks for the information. I must have missed these two posting. I need to take a look.
Richard
Unless I missed something, neither posting really cover a comparison between SharePoint and Quickr.