Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets - Part I - Anatomy of a Widget Creating Twitter Bootstrap Widgets - Part II - Let's Assemble Creat... -
Over the past few weeks there has been a significant number of discussions about Domino and the lack of SHA-2 support. Jesse Gallagher had ...
-
As often said by Dr. McCoy in the original Star Trek series, he is a doctor, not a ____________ . However, just like Dr. McCoy, you may ...
3 comments:
See Duffbert's posting:
http://www.duffbert.com/duffbert/blog.nsf/d6plinks/TADF-7LY5CC
You saw Ed's recent post from this week I am sure as well.
If Integration is important, we integrate better to SP.
What the customer wants to do is important as well as Quickr can bring a company into Web 2.0 better than SP but again context is the issue.
I try to provide an ROI of 90 days or less for Quickr projects. Sharepoint can involve hardware and infrastructure costs depending on how they want to roll it out.
Replication for remote locations might be a good selling point as well as Quickr with DAOS can reduce network traffic and disk space usage.
Keith,
Thanks for the information. I must have missed these two posting. I need to take a look.
Richard
Keith,
Unless I missed something, neither posting really cover a comparison between SharePoint and Quickr.
Post a Comment